Relationship Between Time and Keyboarding Proficiency
By Michelle Mehlberg
CET785
Dakota State University
Disclaimer
- The data used in this report is fictitious and in no way
Introduction:
With the advancement and implementation of technology within school districts across the state, students are being required to learn basic technological skills at an earlier age in order to take advantage of what is available to them. Keyboarding is one of the basic skills that must be mastered for many technology projects to be completed successfully and accurately.
Statement of Problem:
Many school districts at this time do not have keyboarding curriculum in place within their elementary schools or if they do, it is within the upper elementary grades. For those districts that are looking to add the curriculum, the question arises as to how young a student can be introduced to keyboarding successfully as well as to how much time a student needs to spend keyboarding in order to master the skill proficiently.
Review of the Literature:
The goal of keyboarding instruction is to enable students to be more efficient in computer use and to avoid lengthy re-teaching of computer skills. (Anonymous, 1999) Much of the research that has been compiled so far on keyboarding instruction has been done on upper elementary or middle school students. In a recent study (Mikkelsen, 1988) students in various grade levels made similar progress in the development of their keyboarding skills regardless of their grade level, gender or prior experience with typing. In a study done in Indiana (1991) it was found with a group of fourth graders that when their scores were compared to the following year, showed an increase in speed of 9 words per minute. This study was base on instruction time. Although, Mikkelson and the Indiana study targeted middle to upper level elementary students, there have been studies done on PK to lower elementary students. Cowles (1983) found that children ages 5 to 8 could learn keyboarding skills. Seven and eight year olds could keyboard sentences successfully, while the 5 and 6 year olds could keyboard words competently. Based on the studies that have been complete so far, the indication seems to be that lower elementary students can learn to keyboard proficiently when given sufficient time to learn the skill.
Statement of Hypothesis:
There will be a positive relationship between the amount of time spent keyboarding and accuracy of the skill.
Method:
Subjects: The subjects within this study are 34 second grade students at Conde School District, Conde South Dakota.
Instruments: Data will be gathered using the generated reports from the keyboarding program "Type to Learn" targeting accuracy.
Design: Correlational Study
Procedure: Accuracy of second grade students will be measured using the keyboarding program "Type to Learn". The students will be split into 6 different groups with varying time requirements to use the program. One group of 6 will spend 15 minutes a week; one group of 6 will spend 30 minutes a week; one group of 6 will spend 45 minutes per week keyboarding; one group of 6 will spend 100 minutes per week; one group of 6 will spend 115 minutes keyboarding and the last group of 4 will spend 130 minutes keyboarding. After completion of the unit the student will print out a report that is generated by the keyboarding program to collect and measure the data of time spent keyboarding in relation to the accuracy achieved by the student.
Data Analysis:
In a correlation study using the spreadsheet program Excel and its data analysis feature, a Pearson coefficient value of r = .77 was calculated. This indicates a high positive relationship between the two variables, time and accuracy.
Conclusion:
The results of the data that was gathered and researched shows a high positive correlation between time spent keyboarding and accuracy in keyboarding. Even though this study indicates a high positive relationship between time and accuracy there still needs to be much research done as the study does not take into account outside variables that might have influenced the results.
References
Cowles, M. and Others. (1983) An analysis of young children learning keyboarding skills. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED238542
Hunter, W. and Others. (1989, Nov-Dec) On a Need – to – know basis: keyboarding instruction for elementary students. Writing Notebook, 7, p.23-25.
Kercher, L. (1985) Keyboarding issues in elementary education: some research findings. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED289481).
Anonymous. (1999) Keyboarding instruction: Research, synopsis, and trends; January 1999 Update.
http://www.iceberg.org/~bdahlster/keyboarding.html. (June 8,2000)Mikkelsen, V. (1988) Teaching keyboarding skills to elementary school students in supervised and unsupervised environments. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED301152).
Sormunen, C. (1991, March) Elementary school keyboarding: A case for skill development. Business Education Forum, 45, p28-30.